<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AdMarkTech.Com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://admarktech.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://admarktech.com</link>
	<description>Reporting On New and Innovative Marketing and Advertising Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Do We Really Know What We Want? by MikeSchinkel</title>
		<link>http://admarktech.com/2008/04/01/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-versus-television-advertising/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeSchinkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admarktech.com/2008/04/01/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-versus-television-advertising/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael: Thanks for the link. I think you are still off-base. There are natural limits to TV advertising but no foreseeable limits to bluetooth proximity marketing which is where it become untenable. I've wrote more on the subject here: 
http://mikeschinkel.com/blog/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-future/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael: Thanks for the link. I think you are still off-base. There are natural limits to TV advertising but no foreseeable limits to bluetooth proximity marketing which is where it become untenable. I&#8217;ve wrote more on the subject here:<br />
<a href="http://mikeschinkel.com/blog/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-future/" rel="nofollow">http://mikeschinkel.com/blog/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-future/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video Ads Stand Out At Scan Scout by Commercially Driven Online Video Content : AdMarkTech.Com</title>
		<link>http://admarktech.com/2008/05/16/video-ads-stand-out-at-scan-scout/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Commercially Driven Online Video Content : AdMarkTech.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admarktech.com/?p=122#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] PostAdaptv Completes The Puzzle To Serve Viewer Friendly Targeted Online Video AdvertisingVideo Ads Stand Out At Scan Scout    Filed Under: Featured &#8226; Online &#8226; Video Advertising   Tags: broadband enterprises [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PostAdaptv Completes The Puzzle To Serve Viewer Friendly Targeted Online Video AdvertisingVideo Ads Stand Out At Scan Scout    Filed Under: Featured &bull; Online &bull; Video Advertising   Tags: broadband enterprises [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Reason Why Adify Will Satisfy and Gratify by markbates</title>
		<link>http://admarktech.com/2008/04/05/the-reason-why-adify-will-satisfy-and-gratify/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>markbates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admarktech.com/?p=54#comment-30</guid>
		<description>It's really interesting how companies like Adify have popped up out of nowhere to capture online spend. I'd put AdBidCentral, a futures market platform in the same category....they've created a platform to bring premium advertisers to a fragmented media audience....

How many more are we going to see ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting how companies like Adify have popped up out of nowhere to capture online spend. I&#8217;d put AdBidCentral, a futures market platform in the same category&#8230;.they&#8217;ve created a platform to bring premium advertisers to a fragmented media audience&#8230;.</p>
<p>How many more are we going to see ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do We Really Know What We Want? by Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://admarktech.com/2008/04/01/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-versus-television-advertising/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admarktech.com/2008/04/01/bluetooth-proximity-marketing-versus-television-advertising/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>There may be a happy medium and I hope someone finds it.  Imagine the 'push for help' buttons at Lowes and other department stores.  Perhaps a 'push for offer' button at a station may be the right approach - where the bluetooth station only sends a message to the closest (strongest) signal.  

I think the same with SMS - perhaps you SMS a number that's advertised to opt-in to getting messages.

The key difference with email, bluetooth, and SMS is that I pay a bill - not the advertiser.  With respect to broadcast television - it's paid for by the advertiser.  A similar comparison might be putting commercials on HBO.  People would surely freak out!

Great conversation - thanks for reaching out!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be a happy medium and I hope someone finds it.  Imagine the &#8216;push for help&#8217; buttons at Lowes and other department stores.  Perhaps a &#8216;push for offer&#8217; button at a station may be the right approach - where the bluetooth station only sends a message to the closest (strongest) signal.  </p>
<p>I think the same with SMS - perhaps you SMS a number that&#8217;s advertised to opt-in to getting messages.</p>
<p>The key difference with email, bluetooth, and SMS is that I pay a bill - not the advertiser.  With respect to broadcast television - it&#8217;s paid for by the advertiser.  A similar comparison might be putting commercials on HBO.  People would surely freak out!</p>
<p>Great conversation - thanks for reaching out!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bluetooth Adverjacking by Just Because You Can&#8230; &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://admarktech.com/2008/03/24/bluetooth-adverjacking/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Because You Can&#8230; &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admarktech.com/2008/03/24/bluetooth-adverjacking/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] marketing has already evolved. Michael Katz has penned the phrase, Adverjacking, describing the practice of your competition hitting you up with a competitive message while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] marketing has already evolved. Michael Katz has penned the phrase, Adverjacking, describing the practice of your competition hitting you up with a competitive message while [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
